Posted On :

The analysis in Section as applied to the model problem provides an attra ctive perspective to the solution of certain partial differential equations: the solution is identified w ith a “point”, which minimizes an appropriately constructed functional over an admis- sible function space.

**WEAK FORMULATI ON OF THE WEIGHTED RESIDUAL STATEMENT.**

The analysis in Section as applied to the model problem provides an attra ctive perspective to the solution of certain partial differential equations: the solution is identified w ith a “point”, which minimizes an appropriately constructed functional over an admis- sible function space. Weak (variational) forms can be made fully equivalent to respective strong forms , as evidenced in the discussion of the weighted resid ual methods, under certain smoothness assumptions. However, the equivalence between weak (variati onal) forms and variational principles is not gu aranteed: indeed, there exists no general method of construct-

ing functionals I [u], whos e extremization recovers a desired weak (variational) form. In this

sense, only certain partial d ifferential equations are amenable to analysis and solution by variational methods.

Vainberg’s theorem provides the necessary and sufficient condition for the equivalence of a weak (variational) form to a functi onal extremization problem. If such equivalenc e holds, the functional is referred to as a potential.

Theorem (Vainberg)

Consider a weak (variational) form

G(u, δu) := B(u, δu) + (f, δu) + (q¯ , δu)Γq = 0 ,

where u ∈ U , δu ∈ U0 , and f and q¯ are independent of u. Assume th at G pos- sesses a Gˆateaux derivative in a neighb orhood N of u, and the Gˆateaux differen- tial Dδu1 B(u, δu2) is

continuous in u at every point of N .

Then, the necessary and sufficient condition for the above weak form to b e derivable from a

potential in N is that

Dδu1 G(u, δu2) = Dδu2 G(u, δu1) ,

Namely that Dδu1 G(u, δu2) be symmetric for all δu1, δu2 = U0 and all u = N .

Preliminary to proving the above theorem, introduce the following two lemmas:

Lemma 1 Show that Dv I[u] = lim

In the above derivation, no te that operations and |ω=0 are not interchan geable (as they

both refer to the same variable ω), while lim∆ω→0 and |ω=0 are interchangeable, conditional upon sufficient smoothness of I [u].

Lemma 2 (Lagrange’s formula)

Let I [u] be a functional with Gateaux derivatives everywhere, and u, u + δu be any points of U. Then,

I [u + δu] − I [u ] = Dδu I [u + ǫ δu] 0 < ǫ < 1.

To prove Lemma 2, fix u and u + δu in U, and define function f on R as

f(ω) := I[u + ω δu] .

It follows that

Where Lemma 1 was inv oked. Then, u s i n g the standard mean-value theorem of calculus,

Tags : Mechanical - Finite Element Analysis - Finite Element Formulation of Boundary Value Problems

Last 30 days 47 views
Related words : ### What is Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement Define Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement Definition of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement where how
meaning of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement
lecturing notes for Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement lecture notes question and answer for Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement answer
Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement study material Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement assignment Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement reference description of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement
explanation of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement brief detail of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement easy explanation solution Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement wiki
Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement wikipedia how why is who were when is when did where did Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement list of Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement school assignment college assignment
Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement college notes school notes kids with diagram or figure or image difference between Weak Formulati on of the Weighted Residual Statement www.readorrefer.in - Read Or Refer

Recent New Topics :
| Using OpenMP to Produce a Parallel Application | | Creating and Resuming Suspended Threads | | Parallelization Patterns | | Performance by Design | | How Structure Impacts Performance | | The Performance of 32-Bit versus 64-Bit Code | | The Translation of Source Code to Assembly Language | | JSP-JSD | | Structured System Analysis and Structured Design | | Incremental Design | | Stepwise Refinement | | Describing object-oriented design patterns | | Design Processes and Design Strategies | | Design Methods | | The Architecture Concepts | | What can be modeled using sequence diagrams? | | Association, Aggregation and Composition Relationships | | Software Design: Maintenance and Metrics | | Domain Model | | Overview of Diagrams: Collaboration-Sequence, Class | | Object-oriented systems | | Software Design: Normalization | | Software Design: Cohesion | | Software Design: Coupling | | Software Design: Transform Analysis |