Author :

Posted On :
Abstract: There are two basic approaches to numerically evaluate the dynamic response. The first approach is numerical interpolation of the excitation and the second is numerical integration of the equation of motion. Both approaches are applicable to linear systems but the second approach is related to non-linear systems. In this page and next page, various numerical techniques based on interpolation, finite difference equation and assumed acceleration are employed to arrive at the dynamic response due to force and base excitation.

**Dynamic
response of structures using numerical methods**

**Abstract: **There are
two basic approaches to numerically evaluate the** **dynamic response. The
first approach is numerical interpolation of the excitation and the second is
numerical integration of the equation of motion. Both approaches are applicable
to linear systems but the second approach is related to non-linear systems. In
this chapter, various numerical techniques based on interpolation, finite
difference equation and assumed acceleration are employed to arrive at the
dynamic response due to force and base excitation.

**Key words: **time stepping, time history,
central difference, explicit method, Runge-Kutta method, Newmark’s method,
Wilson-*θ* method.

**Introduction **

It was clearly demonstrated in earlier
chapters that analytical or closed form solution of the *Duhamel integral*
can be quite cumbersome even for relatively simple excitation problems.
Moreover, the exciting force such as an earthquake ground record cannot be
expressed by a single mathematical expression, such as the analytical solution
of the Duhamel integral procedure. Hence to solve practical problems, numerical
evaluation techniques must be employed to arrive at the dynamic response.

To evaluate dynamic response
problem there are two approaches, the first of which has two parts:

1. Numerical
interpolation of the excitation

2. Numerical
integration and Duhamel integral.

The other approach is derived by integration of the equation
of motion

or for the single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system

Both the above approaches are applicable to linear systems,
but only the second approach is valid for non-linear systems.

**Time stepping methods **

Assume an inelastic equation to be solved as

Subject to the initial condition

Usually the system is assumed to have a linear damping, but
other forms of damping such as nonlinear damping should be considered. The
applied force *F*(*t*) is defined at discrete time intervals and the
time increment (see Fig. 7.1)

may be assumed as constant, although this is not necessary. If
the response is determined at the time *t _{i}*, is called

The third term on the left has solution gives the resisting
force at time *t _{i}* as

*u _{i} *

if the numerical procedure is
applied successively with *i* = 0, 1, 2,É. The time stepping procedure
gives the desired response at all times with the known initial conditions *u*_{0}
and *u***˙**_{0} .

The time stepping procedure is
not an exact procedure. The characteristics of any numerical procedure that
converges to a correct answer are as follows:

• Convergence
- if the time step is recorded, the procedure should converge to an exact
solution.

• The
procedure should be stable in the presence of numerical rounding errors.

The procedure should provide results close enough to the exact
solution.

**Types of time stepping
method **

There are three types of time stepping method:

1. Methods
based on the interpolation of the excitation function (See Section 7.3.1).

2. Methods
based on finite difference expressions for the velocity and acceleration (See
Section 7.3.3).

3. Methods
based on assumed variation of acceleration (See Section 7.3.5).

1 Interpolation of the excitation

Duhamel integral expression for the damped and undamped SDOF
system to arbitrary excitation can be solved using numerical quadrature
techniques such as *Simpson’s method, trapezoid method* or *Gauss rule*.
It is generally more convenient to interpolate the excitation function *F*(*t*)
as (see Fig. 7.1)

F(*τ*) is
known as interpolated force and *τ* varies from 0 to ∆*t*. Hence differential equation of noted for an
undamped SDOF system becomes

The solution of Eq. 7.11 of the
sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions on the time interval 0 ≤ *τ* ≤ ∆*t*. The
homogeneous part of the solution is evaluated for initial condition of
displacement *u _{i}* and velocity

The particular solution consists of two parts: (1) the
response to an real step for a magnitude of *F _{i}* ; and (2) the
response to a ramp function by (∆

tion 7.12a and 7.12b are the
recurrence formulae for computing displacement *u _{i}*

*Recurrence formulae *for a
displacement and velocity under-damped system* *may be derived in the same
manner. A simpler and more convenient representation of the recurrence formulae
simplified by Eq. 7.12a and 7.12b are

Equation 7.13a and 7.13b are the
recurrence formulae for *ρ* < 1.
The coefficients given in Table 7.1 depend on ω* _{n}*,

Example 7.1

The water tank shown in Fig.7. 2a is subjected to the blast
loading illustrated in Fig 7.2b. Write a computer program in MATLAB to
numerically evaluate

the dynamic response of the tower
by interpolation of the excitation. Plot the displacement *u*(*t*)
and velocity *u***˙** (*t* ) response in time interval 0 ≤ *t* < 0.5s. Assume *W* =
445.5kN, *k* = 40913kN/m, *ρ* = 0.05; *F*_{0} = 445.5kN, *t _{d}*
= 0.05s. Use the step size as 0.005s.

Calculate natural period.

The constants are calculated as

*a *= 0.9888 *a*′* *= -4.4542

*b *= 0.0049 *b*′* *= 0.9740

*c *= 1.82 e-10 *c*′* *= 5.4196e-08

*d *= 9.1305e-011 *d*′* *= 5.467e-08

Using the recurrence formulae *u*
and *u***˙** can be calculated as shown in Table 7.2.

The displacement time history and the velocity time history
are plotted as shown in Fig. 7.3 and the program is given below.

Response history for (a) displacement and (b) velocity
for* *Example 7.1.

Program 7.1: MATLAB program for dynamic response of SDOF
using recurrence formulae

%*********************************************************** %
DYNAMIC RESPONSE DUE TO EXTERNAL LOAD USING WILSON RECURRENCE FORMULA

%
**********************************************************

m=45412.8;

k=40913000;

wn=sqrt(k/m)

r=0.05;

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=.50;

n=100;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.05;

jk=td/dt;

for
m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0;

end

t=-dt

% **********************************************************

% ANY
EXTERNAL LOADING VARIATION MUST BE DEFINED HERE

%
**********************************************************

for
m=1:jk+1;

t=t+dt;

p(m)=445500*(td-t)/td;

end

wd=wn*sqrt(1-r^2);

a=exp(-r*wn*dt)*(r*sin(wd*dt)/sqrt(1-r^2)+cos(wd*dt));

b=exp(-r*wn*dt)*(sin(wd*dt))/wd;

c2=((1-2*r^2)/(wd*dt)-r/sqrt(1-r^2))*sin(wd*dt)-(1+2*r/(wn*dt))*cos(wd*dt);

c=(1/k)*(2*r/(wn*dt)+exp(-r*wn*dt)*(c2));

d 2 = e x p ( - r * w n * d t ) * ( ( 2 . 0 * r ^ 2 - 1 ) / (
w d * d t ) * s i n ( w d . * d t ) + 2 . 0 * r /

(wn*dt)*cos(wd*dt));

d=(1/k)*(1-2.0*r/(wn*dt)+d2);

ad=-exp(-r*wn*dt)*wn*sin(wd*dt)/(sqrt(1-r^2));

bd=exp(-r*wn*dt)*(cos(wd*dt)-r*sin(wd*dt)/sqrt(1-r^2));

c 1 = e x p ( - r * w n * d t ) * ( ( w n / s q r t ( 1 - r ^
2 ) + r / ( d t * s q r t ( 1 - r^2)))*sin(wd*dt)+cos(wd*dt)/dt);

cd=(1/k)*(-1/dt+c1);
d1=exp(-r*wn*dt)*(r*sin(wd*dt)/sqrt(1-r^2)+cos(wd*dt)); dd=(1/(k*dt))*(1-d1);

for m=2:n1 u(m)=a*u(m-1)+b*v(m-1)+c*p(m-1)+d*p(m);
v(m)=ad*u(m-1)+bd*v(m-1)+cd*p(m-1)+dd*p(m);

end

for m=1:n1 s(m)=(m-1)*dt

end figure(1);

plot(s,u,Ôk’);

xlabel(Ô
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(Ô Response displacement u in m’) title(Ô dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v,Ôk’);

xlabel(Ô
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(Ô Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(Ô dynamic
response’)

3 Direct
integration of equation of motion

In direct integration, the
equation of motion is integrated using a step-by-step procedure. It has two
fundamental concepts: (1) the equation of motion is satisfied at only discrete
time intervals ∆*t* and (2)
for any time *t*, the variation of displacements, velocity and
acceleration with each time interval ∆*t *is assumed.

Consider the SDOF system

It is assumed that displacement velocity and acceleration at
time *t* = 0 are given as *u*_{0}, *u***˙** _{0},
*u***˙˙**_{0} respectively. Algorithms can be derived to calculate
the solution at some time *t* + ∆*t* based upon the solution at time ‘*t*’.
Several commonly based direct integration methods are presented below.

*Central difference method*

This method is based on finite difference approximation of the
time derivations of displacements (velocity and acceleration). Taking a
constant time step ∆t

The above method uses equilibrium
condition at time *i* but does not satisfy equilibrium condition at *i*
+ 1.

In Eq. 7.17b it is observed that known displacements of *u _{i}*,

This is not a constraint for SDOF
systems because a much smaller time step is chosen for better accuracy. The
steps taken in the central difference method are given in Table 7.3.

Example 7.2

A single story shear frame shown in Fig. 7.4a is subjected to
arbitrary excitation force specified in Fig. 7.4b. The rigid girder supports a
load of 25.57kN/m.

Assume the columns bend about
their major axis and neglect their mass, and assuming damping factor of *ρ* = 0.02 for steel structures, *E*
= 200GPa. Write a computer program for the central difference method to
evaluate dynamic response for the frame. Plot displacement *u*(*t*),
velocity *v*(*t*) and acceleration *a*(*t*) in the interval
0* *≤* t *≤* *5s.

Solution

(a) The total
load on the beam = 25.57 × 10 = 255.7kN

Table 7.4 gives the displacement, velocity and acceleration up
to 1s.

The displacement, velocity and acceleration response are shown
in Fig. 7.5. The computer program in MATLAB is given below.

*Program 7.2: MATLAB program for
dynamic response of SDOF using central difference method*

%**********************************************************

%DYNAMIC
RESPONSE USING CENTRAL DIFFERENCE METHOD

%**********************************************************

ma=26065;

k=2369904.0;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

r=0.02;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=5;

n=100;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.9;

jk=td/dt;

%*********************************************************** %
LOADING IS DEFINED HERE

%***********************************************************
for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0; end

t=-dt

for m=1:8; t=t+dt; p(m)=20000;

end p(9)=16000.0 for m=10:12 t=t+dt
p(m)=12000.0 end

for m=13:19 t=t+dt

p(m)=12000.0*(1-(t-0.6)/.3) end
an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma up=u(1)-dt*v(1)+dt*dt*an(1)/2
kh=ma/(dt*dt)+c/(2.0*dt) a=ma/(dt*dt)-c/(2.0*dt) b=k-2.0*ma/(dt*dt)
f(1)=p(1)-a*up-b*u(1) u(2)=f(1)/kh

for m=2:n1 f(m)=p(m)-a*u(m-1)-b*u(m)
u(m+1)=f(m)/kh

end v(1)=(u(2)-up)/(2.0*dt) for
m=2:n1

v(m)=(u(m+1)-u(m-1))/(2.0*dt)
an(m)=(u(m+1)-2.0*u(m)+u(m-1))/(dt*dt) end

n1p=n1+1 for m=1:n1p

s(m)=(m-1)*dt end

for m=1:n1 x(m)=(m-1)*dt end

figure(1);

plot(s,u,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(x,v,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(x,an,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sq.sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

4.Single step methods

*Runge–Kutta method*

These methods are classified as single step since they require
knowledge of only *x _{i}* to determine

Equations 7.26a and 7.26b represent an averaging of the
velocity and acceleration by Simpson’s rule within the time interval ∆*t*. The
fourth order Runge-Kutta method is summarized in Table 7.5.

Example 7.3

A steel water tank shown in Fig.
7.6a is analysed as an SDOF system having a mass on top of cantilever which
acts as a spring and dashpot for damping. A blast load of *P*(*t*) is
applied as shown in Fig. 7.6b. The values of the force are given in Table 7.6.
Draw displacement, velocity and acceleration responses up to 0.5s. The damping
for steel may be assumed to be 2% of critical damping.

Solution

Given

*W *= 133.5kN

Figure 7.7 shows the displacement, velocity and acceleration
response for the tank. The values are given in Table 7.7 and the program is
given below.

%********************************************************************
% DYNAMIC RESPONSE DUE TO EXTERNAL LOADING RUNGE KUTTA METHOD %********************************************************************
ma=13608.5;

k=17500000;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

r=0.02;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=.5;

n=50;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.1;

jk=td/dt;

%**************************************************************
% EXTERNAL LOADING IS DEFINED HERE
%************************************************************** for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0; end p(2)=267000.0 p(3)=445000.0 p(4)=364000.0
p(5)=284000.0 p(6)=213000.0 p(7)=142000.0 p(8)=89000.0

p(9)=53400.0

p(10)=26700.0
an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma t=0.0

for i=2:n1 ui=u(i-1) vi=v(i-1)
ai=an(i-1) d(1)=vi q(1)=ai for j=2:3 l=0.5

x=ui+l*dt*d(j-1)
d(j)=vi+l*dt*q(j-1) q(j)=(p(i)-c*d(j)-k*x)/ma end

j=4

l=1 x=ui+l*dt*d(j-1)
d(j)=vi+l*dt*q(j-1)

q(j)=(p(i)-c*d(j)-k*x)/ma
u(i)=u(i-1)+dt*(d(1)+2.0*d(2)+2.0*d(3)+d(4))/6.0
v(i)=v(i-1)+dt*(q(1)+2.0*q(2)+2.0*q(3)+q(4))/6.0 an(i)=(p(i)-c*v(i)-k*u(i))/ma

end

for i=1:n1 s(i)=(i-1)*dt end
figure(1);

plot(s,u,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(s,an,’k’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(4);

plot(s,p,’k’)

xlabel(‘ time (t) in seconds’)
ylabel(‘ force in Newtons’) title(‘ Excitation Force’)

7.3.5 Assumed
acceleration methods

*Average acceleration method*

It is assumed that with a small increment of time ∆*t*, the
acceleration is the average value of the acceleration at the beginning of the
interval *u***˙˙*** _{i}* and the acceleration at the end
of the interval

A computational algorithm can be developed in terms of
incremental quantities for applied load ∆*F _{i}* for displacement ∆

Even though this kind of
incremental form is not necessary for linear systems, it is required for
nonlinear systems and with non-proportional damping which we will see in a
later chapter. Table 7.8 gives a step-by-step solution using the average
acceleration method (incremental form).

*Table 7.8 *Average acceleration
method

It can be proved that the average
acceleration method or constant acceleration method just discussed is
equivalent to the trapezoidal rule. It is also a special form of the Newmark
method which will be discussed later.

Example 7.4

The shear frame shown in Fig.
7.9a is subjected to the exponential pulse force shown in Fig 7.9b. Write a
computer program for the average acceleration method (incremental formulation)
to evaluate the dynamic response of the frame. Plot the time histories for
displacement *u*(*t*), velocity *u***˙** (*t* ) and
acceleration *u***˙˙**(*t* ) in the time interval 0-3s. Assume *E*
= 200 GPa, *W* = 1079.1kN, *ρ* = 0.07, *F _{0}* = 450kN and

Solution

Given

*I *for ISWB
600 @1337 = 106 198.5e^{4}mm^{4}

Mass = *m*
= 110 000 kg

∆*t *≤* *0.065s*
*

We use ∆*t* = 0.01s.

The displacement velocity and
acceleration response are shown in Fig. 7.10 and the values are given in Table
7.9. The program using MATLAB for constant acceleration method is given below.

*Program 7.4: MATLAB program for
dynamic response by constant acceleration method*

% Response by constant acceleration method. ma=110000;

k=10075582;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

r=0.07;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=3;

n=300;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.75;

jk=td/dt; for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0; end jk1=jk+1 for
n=1:jk1 t=(n-1)*dt

p(n)=450000*(1-t/td)*exp(-2.0*t/td)
end

an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma
kh=k+4.0*ma/(dt*dt)+2.0*c/dt for i=1:n1

s(i)=(i-1)*dt end

for i=2:n1 ww=p(i)-p(i-1)+(4.0*ma/dt+2.0*c)*v(i-1)+2.0*ma*an(i-1)
xx=ww/kh

yy=(2/dt)*xx-2.0*v(i-1)
zz=(4.0/(dt*dt))*(xx-dt*v(i-1))-2.0*an(i-1) u(i)=u(i-1)+xx

v(i)=v(i-1)+yy an(i)=an(i-1)+zz
end

figure(1);

plot(s,u);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(s,an);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(4);

plot(s,p)

xlabel(‘ time (t) in seconds’)
ylabel(‘ force in Newtons’) title(‘ Excitation Force’)

6.Assumed acceleration
method (linear variation)

*Linear acceleration method*

In this method a linear variation of acceleration from time *t _{i}*
to

After determining *u _{i}*

The displacement velocity and acceleration are almost the same
as in the average acceleration method and the response curve is exactly the
same as in Fig. 7.10. The program for linear acceleration method in MATLAB is
given below.

*Program 7.5: MATLAB program for
dynamic response by linear acceleration method*

% Linear Acceleration Method. %*******************************
ma=110000;

k=10075582;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

r=0.07;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=3;

n=300;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.75;

jk=td/dt; for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0; end jk1=jk+1 for
n=1:jk1 t=(n-1)*dt

p(n)=450000*(1-t/td)*exp(-2.0*t/td)
end

an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma
kh=k+6.0*ma/(dt*dt)+3.0*c/dt for i=1:n1

s(i)=(i-1)*dt end

for i=2:n1
ww=p(i)-p(i-1)+ma*(6.0*v(i-1)/dt+3.0*an(i-1))+c*(3.0*v(i-1)+dt*an(i-1)/2)
xx=ww/kh

zz=(6.0/(dt*dt))*(xx-dt*v(i-1)-dt*dt*an(i-1)/2)
yy=dt*an(i-1)+dt*zz/2.0 vv=v(i-1)*dt+(dt*dt)*(3.0*an(i-1)+zz)/6.0
v(i)=v(i-1)+yy

an(i)=an(i-1)+zz u(i)=u(i-1)+vv
end

figure(1);

plot(s,u);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(s,an);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sec’)

title(‘ dynamic response’)
figure(4);

plot(s,p)

xlabel(‘ time (t) in seconds’)
ylabel(‘ force in Newtons’) title(‘ Excitation Force’)

7.Stepping methods

*Newmark’s method*

In 1959, N.M. Newmark developed a *time stepping method*
based on the following equations:

The parameter *β* and *γ* define the variation of
acceleration over a time step and determine the stability and accuracy
characteristics of the method. Usually

*γ* is
selected as ^{1}/_{2} and
^{1}_{6} ≤
*β* ≤
^{1}_{4} is
satisfactory from all points of view,

including accuracy. Equation 7.48
combined with an equilibrium equation at the end of the time step provides the
basis of computing *u* _{i}_{+} _{1} , *u***˙** _{i}_{+} _{1} , *u***˙˙**_{i}_{+}_{1} knowing
the values of *u _{i}* ,

For linear systems as the ones discussed in the chapter there
is no iteration needed. Newmark’s method for linear systems is given in Table
7.11. It is proved that Newmark’s method is stable if

The above proves that the average acceleration method is
stable for any ∆*t*, no
matter how large; however, it is accurate only if ∆*t* is small
enough. For the linear acceleration method γ
= ^{1}/_{2}, *β* = 1/6 and that is stable if

To get an accurate estimate a shorter time step must be used:

The program for Newark’s method’s given in below. Example 7.4
is solved using Newark’s method (*γ* = ^{1}/_{2}, *β* = 1/6) - linear acceleration
method - and we get displacement, velocity and acceleration time response as
shown in Fig 7.10.

*Program 7.6: MATLAB program for Nemark’s method
for linear systems*

%***********************************************************

%
NEWMARK’S METHOD FOR AVERAGE OR LINEAR
ACCELERATION METHODS

%BETA=0.25
.... AVERAGE ACCELERATION METHOD

%BETA = 0.167 .... LINEAR
ACCELERATION METHOD
%*********************************************************** ma=110000;

k=10075582;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

gamma=0.5

beta=0.25

r=0.07;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=3.0;

n=300;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.75;

a=ma/(beta*dt)+gamma*c/beta
b=ma/(2.0*beta)+dt*c*(gamma/(2.0*beta)-1) jk=td/dt;

%***********************************************************
% THIS IS WHERE LOAD IS DEFINED
%*********************************************************** for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0; end jk1=jk+1 for
n=1:jk1 t=(n-1)*dt

p(n)=450000*(1-t/td)*exp(-2.0*t/td)
end

an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma
kh=k+ma/(beta*dt*dt)+gamma*c/(beta*dt) for i=1:n1

s(i)=(i-1)*dt end

for i=2:n1
ww=p(i)-p(i-1)+a*v(i-1)+b*an(i-1) xx=ww/kh

zz=xx/(beta*dt*dt)-v(i-1)/(beta*dt)-an(i-1)/(2.0*beta)
yy=(gamma*xx/(beta*dt)-gamma*v(i-1)/beta+dt*(1-gamma/(2.0*beta))*an(i-1))

v(i)=v(i-1)+yy an(i)=an(i-1)+zz

vv=dt*v(i-1)+dt*dt*(3.0*an(i-1)+zz)/6.0
u(i)=u(i-1)+vv

end figure(1);

plot(s,u,’K’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v,’K’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(s,an,’K’);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(4);

plot(s,p,’K’)

xlabel(‘ time (t) in seconds’)
ylabel(‘ force in Newtons’) title(‘ Excitation Force’)

7.3.8 Conditionally
stable method

*Wilson-**θ** method*

A method developed by E L Wilson
is a modification of the conditionally stable linear acceleration method that
makes it unconditionally stable. This is based on the assumption that
acceleration varies linearly over an extended time step *δ**t* = *θ*∆*t* as shown in Fig. 7.12. The accuracy and stability
properties of the method depend on the value *θ* which is always greater than 1.

The numerical procedure is derived in a similar line of linear
acceleration methods. Everything described in this chapter will be useful to a
multiple-degrees-of-freedom (MDOF) non-linear system with non-proportional
damping. The incremental velocity and incremental acceleration can be given as

and the incremental velocity and displacement are determined
from Eq. 7.52a, 7.52b. For the MDOF system *δ**u _{i}* is determined using a
tangent stiffness matrix and an iterative procedure. Table 7.12 gives the
algorithm for the Wilson-

As discussed earlier, the value
of *θ* governs the stability characteristics
of the Wilson-*θ* method.
If *θ* = 1 this method is the linear
acceleration method, which is stable for ∆*t*< 0.551 *T*_{n} when *T*_{n}
is the shortest natural period of time. If *θ* ≥ 1.37 the
Wilson-*θ* method
is *unconditionally* stable, making it suitable for direct solution of

It is proved by Wilson that *θ* = 1.42 gives optimal accuracy.

The computer program in MATLAB
for Wilson-*θ* method
for Example 7.4 is given below and we get the displacement. The velocity and
acceleration response are the same as Fig. 7.10.

*Program 7.7: MATLAB program for
dynamic response by Wilson-**θ** Method*

% Wilson theta method %********************** ma=110000;

k=10075582;

wn=sqrt(k/ma)

theta=1.42

r=0.07;

c=2.0*r*sqrt(k*ma)

u(1)=0;

v(1)=0;

tt=3.0;

n=300;

n1=n+1

dt=tt/n;

td=.75;

jk=td/dt; for m=1:n1

p(m)=0.0;

end;

jk1=jk+1; for n=1:jk1;
t=(n-1)*dt;

p(n)=450000*(1-t/td)*exp(-2.0*t/td);
end; an(1)=(p(1)-c*v(1)-k*u(1))/ma;

kh=k+3.0*c/(theta*dt)+6.0*ma/(theta*dt)^2;

a=6.0*ma/(theta*dt)+3.0*c;

b=3.0*ma+theta*dt*c/2.0; for
i=1:n1;

s(i)=(i-1)*dt; end;

for i=2:n1;
ww=(p(i)-p(i-1))*theta+a*v(i-1)+b*an(i-1); xx=ww/kh;

zz=(6.0*xx/((theta*dt)^2)-6.0*v(i-1)/(theta*dt)-3.0*an(i-1))/theta;
yy=dt*an(i-1)+dt*zz/2.0;

v(i)=v(i-1)+yy; an(i)=an(i-1)+zz;

vv=dt*v(i-1)+dt*dt*(3.0*an(i-1)+zz)/6.0;
u(i)=u(i-1)+vv;

end;

figure(1);

plot(s,u);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response displacement u in m’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(2);

plot(s,v);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response velocity v in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(3);

plot(s,an);

xlabel(‘
time (t) in seconds’)

ylabel(‘ Response acceleration a in m/sec’) title(‘ dynamic
response’)

figure(4);

plot(s,p)

xlabel(‘ time (t) in seconds’)
ylabel(‘ force in Newtons’) title(‘ Excitation Force’)

_{ }

Related words : ### What is Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods Define Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods Definition of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods where how
meaning of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods
lecturing notes for Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods lecture notes question and answer for Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods answer
Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods study material Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods assignment Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods reference description of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods
explanation of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods brief detail of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods easy explanation solution Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods wiki
Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods wikipedia how why is who were when is when did where did Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods list of Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods school assignment college assignment
Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods college notes school notes kids with diagram or figure or image difference between Dynamic response of structures using numerical methods www.readorrefer.in - Read Or Refer

Recent New Topics :
| Using OpenMP to Produce a Parallel Application | | Creating and Resuming Suspended Threads | | Parallelization Patterns | | Performance by Design | | How Structure Impacts Performance | | The Performance of 32-Bit versus 64-Bit Code | | The Translation of Source Code to Assembly Language | | JSP-JSD | | Structured System Analysis and Structured Design | | Incremental Design | | Stepwise Refinement | | Describing object-oriented design patterns | | Design Processes and Design Strategies | | Design Methods | | The Architecture Concepts | | What can be modeled using sequence diagrams? | | Association, Aggregation and Composition Relationships | | Software Design: Maintenance and Metrics | | Domain Model | | Overview of Diagrams: Collaboration-Sequence, Class | | Object-oriented systems | | Software Design: Normalization | | Software Design: Cohesion | | Software Design: Coupling | | Software Design: Transform Analysis |